This is a post that takes up a topic that I’ve blogged about
before in a different context. #FreeArchaeology was a discussion of
internships, work experience and the exploitation of willing (read desperate)
junior professionals in search of financially and personally rewarding labour.
Today, though, I spotted a new take on the debate, written by the fabolus Doug
over at Doug’s Archaeology. With terrifyingly good self-produced statistics on
just how productive one could be with access to a good library, and some
assessment on time spent on field projects, his conclusions were that
University archaeology is at least a variant of #FreeArchaeology- if not worse,
as you’re actually paying for the pleasure, or for the bit of paper at the end.
After 8 years in one institution (it wasn’t an HMP, I promise), and heading out of academia with (for now, anyway) no regrets about sliding away into a different industry, I was feeling pretty reflective about the place of universities anyway. I’ve taught a lot of (mostly lovely) undergraduates, I’ve been part of the system, I’ve taught on field schools, I’ve got some pretty strong feelings about Higher Education and its role in archaeology. So I thought I might air them in response to the University #UnfreeArchaeology issue. They’re still pretty tangled, so I beg your patience.
Much of what Doug said I agree with. You can learn at least
as much (factually, at least) on your own than you would at University-
probably more, because you won’t be distracted by friends wanting you to have
fun, taking up dumb new sports and hurting yourself, and carefully stalking and
trapping your future life partner. His point about libraries is a particularly
important one- the decline of the University of Southampton library is one of
the great tragedies I saw unfold over my time there. Real books were shunted to
one side, new books were ignored in favour of paying for giant screens, food
and drink were allowed everywhere except the reserve collection, and slowly but
surely even online journal subscriptions that you’d think were pretty essential
(e.g. “Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory”) were dropped. The library
steadily became, not a place for learning, but a nursery for people on the edge
of adulthood, where the base textbooks lived, some funky specialist examples
hung on, but mostly where people went to revise from their own scribbled notes
and fanny around on Facebook. So, if you want a library, don’t bother with your
average University one. I spent more time just driving to Oxford to use their
library than I did in Southampton library.
Fieldwork training, too, was sketchy at best. The university
approved field school began with me being assigned a 1x1 square in an open
trench and left to get on with it. When I compare that with the careful
training and monitoring that the field school I now work on it makes me
shudder. You would probably be better off doing an unpaid internship for a year
in a commercial archaeology firm than floundering in a world of strange pottery
forms of which you knew nothing at the age of 18. It certainly doesn't prepare
you for a career in actual archaeology, as several people have pointed out. The
same is true of the field schools abroad that I've worked on- they are not the
same as consistent, day in day out work in rainy Britain, learning the skills
that are relevant to the actual place where you’ll be working.
However, what a good university should give you is the most
important facet in being a good archaeologist- the ability to question
yourself. The ability to change your opinion in the face of evidence. Seminars,
discussion, (enforced) peer-to-peer debate. A good university should give you
the chance to find out what you believed about the past was flawed, maybe that
what you still believe is flawed- and why you continue to believe it anyway.
Not developing single-mindedly, trawling in dogmatic fashion through only the
authors you like or agree with, but reading those you don’t, understanding why,
respecting their beliefs. Learning to be a reasoning adult, not a troll or a
teenager trapped in perpetual sulks. That’s the most valuable thing that came
out of University for me. And I don’t think (very sadly) most people can get it
for free.
So sad to hear what has been happening with Southampton University Library. All libraries, not just public ones, appear to be at risk.
ReplyDeleteUniversity is more than just the books as you rightly conclude. I wish that university had given me more confidence as I feel I missed out on a lot as a result. I found seminars and tutorials frightening and felt so lost most of the time. Still not sure how I managed a good 2:1 but it put me off academia and even reading non-fiction for many many years. It has only been in recent years through work that I have begun to develop enough confidence to do more and take advantage of opportunities. I've even started to read non-fiction again. People underestimate the 'soft' skills you need in life and we need more recognition of their importance and role in the overall picture.