Thank you all so much for your lovely words (mostly not in blog comments but elsewhere) and for all the support that flowed in after last week's post about starting my new job. Another week has gone by and I'm still delighted- it is Bank Holiday Monday and I can't help wishing (in a sneaky little geeky way) that I'm at work! What a loser! Anyway, as it is a day off, I can blog- and I thought as it's time for a "Bones" post that I'd blog about the things I found this summer that actually connect up to people in the past. Things that you too can look at online, via the Poggio Civitate Excavation Database- we're proud to be fully open access (when the server is working, at least). Twelve artefacts that my team found in my trench made it into the cataloguing system that we use for artefacts that have a meaningful interpretative role to play. Of course, everything we find is recorded and in many cases drawn in our trench books- before being counted and recorded at the close of the book. Don't worry- all the information is safely stored in the magazzino, even to the weight of single pieces of slag.
I'm sorry that I can't
tell you more about the features in the trench- I don't want to
pre-empt the peer-reviewed publication and presentation. But I
thought I'd write up those twelve things, including a link to them
all- pulling together what they might mean for the site, as well as
how they were recovered. I often joke around with colleagues
about "interpretation at the trowel's edge." This series of
posts, I suppose, is exactly that- a biographical account of the
discovery of these fascinating yet often mundane objects.
The first of my twelve had the honour of being
labelled as PC20130001. It was found when I wasn't even in the
trench, as I had gone back to England to have the interview for my
new job! Our fab site director Kate stepped in to supervise for me,
so this is really a find for her! My trench assistant John "Georgia"
Duggan (who will have his own trench next year hopefully as he is a
fantastic excavator and a great prospect for the future!) was working
on the removal of a large stump, when out popped this particular
find, a shining lump of metal. Everyone (I imagine) got excited, as
there were little nubs of gilt on this object, which made it look
really enticing. Unfortunately, it's not Etruscan. It's probably
post-medieval. It's a gorgeous bronze pendant, which would have been
covered in gilding, and it's moulded to show the figure of San
Domenico on one side, identified by an inscription, and a woman and
child (presumably the Virgin) on the other. It's a find that made me
sad when I saw it after I got back- and not just because I missed
finding it. I imagine a person losing that pendant, and feeling sad
and full of regrets- and I know that's just splashing emotions
inappropriately all over the past, but that's my honest and
instinctive reaction. More seriously, the pendant confirms what we
suspected- the area in which the trench was located, Civitate A, was
clearly still being traversed by people in the centuries after Poggio
Civitate was abandoned- over a thousand years later, someone came
through, perhaps a shepherd or traveller, and lost this pendant.
The next find (PC20130108) is Etruscan, or at
least, I assume it was. And unlike the previous find, this one I
found myself. I was excavating with my trowel in the eastern end of
my trench, working in a locus (the locus system defines the
contextual layers of soil in the order that we remove them, which
SHOULD be the reverse order in which they were deposited) that was
producing relatively large amounts of bone and pottery. I spotted
this weird shape with my trowel- a circle, with a dirty cream edge
smeared with dark earth. I rubbed the object very gently with my
fingers, and pressed in the centre where the mud was- to find that it
fell away. A super careful probe with my trowel point, and it was
clear that this was a nicely hollowed out piece of worked bone,
making a perfect little oval. I pretend that it doesn't matter who
finds things, as we're all part of a team- but I was pretty chuffed
to have this gorgeous little object turn up. The layer that this
piece of worked bone was found in was full of Etruscan material- the
area was clearly pretty busy in antiquity! Yet this little fragment
proved that larger objects incorporating worked bone were either
being made or used in the vicinity.
The third find is again an industrial one
(PC20130112). It looked bloody ugly as it came up- and as we found
quite a few examples of these, I can't remember who actually found
this one. Sorry! It was probably one of the great students we had on
site this year- sharp eyed and sharp brained. One of them probably
thought that this was a piece of pottery at first- a heavy, lumpy
piece of coarseware. Then they turned it over, and found a
weird covering spread all over the inner face- a little bit shiny
where not covered in dirt. The weird covering was actually molten
metal- this pot was used in the process of creating iron artefacts-
the find was a crucible fragment. So, not only do we have evidence
for the presence of worked bone and possibly worked bone production,
we also have evidence for metalworking in the vicinity of Civitate A.
Someone, somewhere, during the Etruscan inhabitation of the site, was
making iron implements.
The final find for this "Bones" post
(PC20130136) is a little bit more exciting- and I remember the
student who found it (I'm so sorry person who found the crucible
fragment!!) as there were not many objects like this found in my
trench this summer. Margot, a student from Mount Holyoke College, had
quite a lot of excavation experience, and had even worked underwater!
It was most likely the green sheen of bronze that first caught her
eye- everyone on site knows that the colour hints at something
special. Carefully using her trowel to free the delicate object from
the soil, she called me over. It was pretty clear at first glance
what Margot had found- a fragment of a fibula, or brooch, made of
bronze. The coiled end and part of the pin were preserved, but the
arch and catch were missing. We didn't find any sign of any other
pieces of the fibula this year, even in slightly lower loci. So, I
suspect that this object was already broken when it was deposited-
thrown away, chucked out. Maybe it was too small to bother melting
back down, maybe it broke while being worn and the piece was never
recovered by the owner. But an Etruscan person was wearing that
fibula at some point in the past, while they were living at Poggio
Civitate. At least one person in this area of the site had access to
a plain, but still quite classy, decorative pin for their clothes.
So, there you are- my first four finds. I've
linked in the find numbers, so you should be able to click on the
"PC" numbers here and see the proper write up by our
amazing cataloguer, Theresa. There aren't professional photographs
yet- but there will be this time next year. Please enjoy browsing
around for what other people found, too. Each find has a little
biography, a story like the ones I've described here. The reactions
of excavators are always fascinating to me- I would love to find some
way of incorporating them into full publications, giving the people
who do the digging a voice! How would you feel about seeing that for
real? Do you think the internet provides an opportunity to open up
archaeological interpretative methodologies? Or is recording instant
reactions and assumptions a dangerous business, undermining the wider
message published by an excavation director? I'm all for embracing
subjectivity- but how far do we go? Let me know if you have any
thoughts, or any discovery stories of your own.